top of page
DSC01637.JPG

Comments

PLEASE NOTE:

After writing your comment and hitting the "Publish" button, you will have a choice of publishing as a "Member" or a "Guest." Either way is fine. Choosing "Guest" is the easier of the two, and keeps you anonymous. If you choose "Member" a box will open up giving you the option of logging in if you already have a username and password, or signing up if you don't. Your comment will then appear under your username. If you close the box without doing anything, your comment will not be posted. Thanks for your patience!

Comments (31)

Lynn
Dec 16

Hello Sympos,


I am struck by the importance of living fully in the world which we find ourselves in.

“Do the duty which lies nearest thee, which thou knowest to be a Duty,” wrote the Scottish philosopher, Thomas Carlyle. “Thy second duty will already have become clearer.”


This seems to me the best way forward, and as much of the angst as we can lay aside, let's do that.


Meanwhile, I think it's "heyday", not "heigh day".


In solidarity.

Like

SymposStan
Dec 04

Dear Editor,


Please notify Professor Sympos that the anagnorisis is never going to come for MAGA Nation: when they realize that they slept with their mom and killed their dad, they will be furious, blame the Deep State, and look for more mothers and fathers to kill. It's a historical tragedy, not a literary one.


The real question is, will the anagnorisis come for Democrats? "It’s about the kind of ignorance that doesn’t know it is ignorance until everything it loved and cherished is lost." Who is it who has been so certain of their righteousness, and of their immunity from tragedy, only to find themselves in deep mourning?


The examples of a better way you cite—FDR, MLK, Ghandi—would have steered well clear of a party that has nothing at all to say to the working class; that ran for a public option in 2020 and then never mentioned it again; that came around after all to law and order at the border; that came around after all to Dick Cheney; and that has, without hesitation, supported, supplied, and funded an ongoing genocide. Lear eventually realizes that he has "ta'en / Too little care of this"—Biden never did. And Cordelia never speaks truth to power, as the Fool does—she says "nothing" out of an iron-clad obedience to her role as a loving daughter. The View: "Would you have done something differently from President Biden during the past four years?" Harris: "There is not a thing that comes to mind."


I didn't vote for Trump: he is indeed a handmaiden of the apocalypse. But, living in New Jersey, where I knew my presidential vote would make no difference at all, I didn't vote for Harris either.


There is a third consolation, after certainty and despair: social action.


Your fan,

Stan

Like
Roman Sympos
Dec 09
Replying to

Dear Stan,


Sorry, I meant to say West Bank and Gaza. We can quarrel over names and policies and statistics and what they mean or portend, but I do take exception to one thing, which I guess It failed to make clear in my last reply. I wasn't working against Humphrey, and had no animus against him, particularly. I was working to defeat LBJ and elect McCarthy.


I look forward to seeing you--"Stan"!


RS

Like

SymposStan
Dec 10
Replying to

Dear Professor,


My apologies: I misread the story! Still, since the "war on poverty" was LBJ's to begin with, I think my point holds.


Stan

Like

Turner
Nov 02

Dear Professor Sympos,


Have you ever worked in wood? The intimacy of woodwork appears to be a theme in your poetry and prose--lathing, carving, chiseling--all the while listening to and learning from the grain.


-- Turner

Like
crzepka
Admin
Nov 02
Replying to

Dear Turner,

Thank you for stopping by! And for those kind words. They are very perceptive.

Except for the crudest repairs and most primitive attempts at assembly or on-the-spot improvisation, e.g., using an old scrap of plywood as a squirrel baffle, no, I haven't. I did, however, build a balsa wood racer when I was a Cub Scout. I'm proud to say it performed up to expectations. It rolled down a ramp in a reasonably straight line.

My father, though, was a carpenter, and my son builds guitars, so if any wood-working talent has left a residue in me, it must have been lying dormant for the last seven decades.

Or expressed itself as you've observed.

Thanks for asking.


Roman Sympos


Like

Mark
Nov 01

On Genocide… very deep; very dark; and a bit more than somewhat, confusing. I share the Professor’s disgust with the Israeli incursion into Gaza…and Lebanon…and Iran. The “eye for an eye” doctrine would have been satisfied with the dispatch of the 1200th Hamas fighter. And unfortunately, short of utter genocide, the only results of their efforts will be generations of new Palestinians to fight with. I will admit to some confusion in the matter of how the Professor is suggesting that his readers vote. As I read his treatise, he indicates on the one hand that he cannot support Harris, while recognizing that the alternative to her is even worse, and that doing nothing is not an option.

Like
crzepka
Admin
Nov 01
Replying to

Thanks for that feedback, Mark! I thought my position was clear, but clearly it wasn't. Yes, please cast your vote for Harris! I already have! (back to the editing board . . .)

Like

Guest
Oct 17

 

Professor: I have a nit to pick in your otherwise excellent essay. I particularly liked the conclusion celebrating the power of humane acts to achieve immortality.

 

I cannot agree that the act of giving has, since the dawn of human consciousness, been understood as something confined to the network of one’s blood relations. While that statement is probably accurate through the late Bronze age, the creation of early Ur type civilizations with trading networks suggests that. Civil authority ( King or Emperor or Pharoah) had transformed the gens to anyone prepared to pay the taxes required of an imperial citizen   

 

I also humbly suggest that you betray your  catholic roots in your use of Jesus as an authoritative civil as well as religious  figure. Using Jesus to illustrate the growth of the gens ignores the historical context of his teachings. The Roman Empire had for hundreds of years prior to Jesus created and maintained a robust and monetized trading economy  throughout the empire which already expanded the relevant community to most of the Mediterranean world. In exchange, merchants gave homage and paid taxes to the emperor. 

 

It is also interesting to note that for two hundred years from the succession of Augustus through the death of Marcus Aurelius, there was no significant “Other” to compel allegiance to the empire but the gens survived. The rise of the Germanic and Gothic (Polish?) barbarians created a huge “Other” steadily encroaching on the Empire through the sack of Rome by the Visigoths in 410 CE but the gens again survived.

 

Your enthusiasm for Jesus does not extend to his followers, particularly your claim that “God’s gift of eternal life is a con perpetrated by the people who chose Him so they can make non-believers do what they say.” Given the tendency of power to corrupt, it is no surprise that many religious leaders prey on their followers. But is is equally true that sincere evangelist Christians and servant leader Catholics are not all Reverend Ike type rip off artists. In discussing religion, it is too easy to ignore the extraordinary sacrifices honestly made by religious leaders for the gens.

      

Like
crzepka
Admin
Oct 21
Replying to

Duly noted! And thanks so much for taking the time to comment. You make some good points. Still, I think my fundamental analysis is sound.

The Romans had their subject peoples (and those they completely wiped out, like the Carthaginians) as "Others" to define themselves against well before the barbarians sacked Rome, just as all imperialist nations establishing colonies have for thousands of years.

As for Ur and succeeding civilizations, your choice of terms like "trading networks" and "trading economy" makes my point for me: there's no need for "trading networks" unless we've reached the outer limit of the gens, where we encounter tribes, nations, and ethnicities that are not "like us," and thus not deserving of our generosity.

As for Jesus, my "enthusiasm" (if it is that--I don't think so) for his teachings about mercy and generosity to those not like us extends up to, but no farther than, his desire to punish those who won't obey his commands and, darn it! be saved! Nor did I mean to imply that there are not good, generous, kind, and helpful people among the faithful of all religions, just as there are also those among them who advocate punishing non-believers for saying "no thanks." The latter are the folks that Blake was taking aim at, as was I.


Roman Sympos

Like

Guest
Oct 12

I loved the poem about your mother, read soon after reading to my granddaughter, as well as the Generosity piece, which had me worried that we were going down that Catholic rabbit hole, but emerged beautifully.

Like
crzepka
Admin
Oct 12
Replying to

Thanks so much!

Like

Guest
Oct 11

With profound apologies to both the good professor and his editor, I must declare that I could find neither relevance nor meaning in this month’s essay having never read most of the cited references, and being too far removed from the Sherlock Holmes collection I cherished as a boy.

Like
crzepka
Admin
Oct 11
Replying to

Very sorry to hear it! However, if you have any opinions of or contributions to Professor Sympos's close readings of "Prufrock," they would be more than welcome, regardless of your familiarity with references or memory of the tales.

Like

Guest
Oct 10

Good to see you're writing these days.

Like

Guest
Sep 06

I wrote the following to Professor Sympos who requested I post same to this "Comments" section of their website...please therefore consider:


Just finished Professor Sympos’ treatise on Generation. Not really sure whether the exercise leaves me feeling smarter for the effort, or relatively more stupid for realizing that I could never — ever — aspire to be so wise. 

I will say that throughout I was reminded of this quote attributed, I believe , to Khalil Gibran:

“The moving hand writes, and having writ, moves on.”

Like

Adam Rzepka
Adam Rzepka
Sep 05

I love the new poem about your Dad, PS! The first stanza reminds me of reading e e cummings as a teenager (he sang his didn’t he danced his did)

Like
Guest
Sep 05
Replying to

Thanks, Adam! There's probably some cummings hummings behind the lines. I had a real attachment to his poetry at one time.

Like
bottom of page